Ay 20 Lab Assignments
Instructor: Phinney
- Observing Proposal (due 13 October 2008)
Instructions.
- Details of the accepted proposals.
- Students working on the projects:
- Tumbling asteroid: Landers, Maseda, Hensley
- Star formation in interacting galaxies: Forbes (theory),
Bilinski (theory/interpretation),
Karkare (filters), Feldman and Silsbee (local and integrated Halpha fluxes),
- ??: Taak
- As of Nov 17 2008, the calibration star data and the
off-band and on-band Halpha galaxy images
are available for the two interacting galaxy pairs, Arp 140 and NGC 520, and
for
NGC2339 (the non-interacting `control' galaxy). The images of the latter
are shown below [off-band (L) and on-band Halpha (R)]
- As of Nov 17 2008, the full set of asteroid data is in hand.
Drew's instructions on how to access and manipulate the
data are
here. See Drew for the username
and password!
- Some references that may be helpful in the tumbling asteroid project:
- Some references that may be helpful in the Halpha project:
- The list of P60 narrowband filters is
here .
Rest Halpha is at 6563 Angstrom (in sealevel air; it is
6565 in vacuum). The filter names are supposed to be the
central wavelengths and widths
e.g. 6564/21 should be the rest Halpha filter, 21 Angstroms width.
So in principle they cover
the redshift range up to (6640/6563 -1) i.e. z=0 to 0.012 or
radial velocities up to 3,500km/s (galaxy distances to 50Mpc).
HOWEVER All the transmission graphs are clearly wrong, and some of the names
may be wrong too: e.g. 6564/100 looks nothing like 6563/100, and why
would there be two filters 100 Angstroms wide with centers only 1 Angstrom
different?
Considering the 6564/21 filter the transmission
graph peaks at 6576 Angstroms, not 6564, and it has a FWHM of about 30
Angstroms and a full width zero intensity of about 66 Angstroms. If the
graph were correct, the equivalent width of the filter would be about
13 Angstroms. None of these reflect the /21 extension. All the
other filter graphs have the same issue. Someone should remeasure these
filters and make sure they are labelled properly!
- Writeup: due in class Friday Dec 5. That class will be devoted
to oral presentations of the results. Please prepare slides in
Open Office/PowerPoint/Keynote or other similar format of your choice.
Writeups should follow the format:
- Introduction -explaining why the project is interesting, scientific context. Motivating the project.
- Data Gathering -explain what data was gathered, when, with what instruments/filters/standards.
- Data Reduction -explain all the steps and software, equations, etc you used to convert the raw data into scientifically useful numbers for the next step:
- Analysis -explain the concepts and equations you used to get
meaningful scientific conclusions from the data.
- Conclusion -summarize the results and put them in broader scientific context. What would you do differently next time?
- Acknowledgements.
- Bibliography of references used.